[postlink]http://ncmp3.blogspot.com/2011/07/ibd-boehner-11-beats-nothing-at-all.html[/postlink]
posted at 9:10 am on July 28, 2011 by Ed Morrissey
printer-friendly
As  John Boehner attempts to whip his caucus for a vote this morning on  version 1.1 of his debt-ceiling bill, the Speaker gets some support from  Investors Business Daily.  It’s not enthusiastic support, mind you, but  IBD’s editors seem to feel that the only thing worse than passion  Boehner 1.1 is not passing Boehner 1.1:
President  Obama may not have a plan for resolving the debt crisis, but he  definitely has a goal — to shift blame for the lousy economy onto  Republicans’ shoulders. Above all else, the GOP must not let that  happen.
When  House Speaker John Boehner released his latest plan to cut spending in  exchange for raising the debt ceiling, attacks from Obama and his fellow  Democrats were to be expected.
The  attacks from the GOP side, however, are short-sighted at best. They  risk giving Obama what he wants more than anything — a way to weasel out  of responsibility for the economic mess his policies have produced.
As Charles Krauthammer did on Wednesday, the conservative IBD editorial board urges Republicans to take a long view:
As  Obama’s poll numbers continue to sag, his hopes for re-election  increasingly depend on his ability to convince voters that he had  nothing to do with the lousy economy. And if the GOP blows the current  debt standoff, Obama will be free to blame any bad economic news going  forward on Republican intransigence.
Republicans  can’t let themselves fall into this trap. Obama, and Obama alone, is  responsible for the fact that two years after the recession ended, the  unemployment rate is above 9%, growth is stagnant, inflation is rising,  and federal spending and debt are exploding.
They  conclude with the thought that it’s better to lose a skirmish than the  entire war, but this isn’t even really losing the skirmish.  It’s not a  great victory either, but Republicans have changed the paradigm of  deficit reduction in Washington in this debate.  Tax hikes are off the  table, and we’re now talking about spending reductions to address the  long-term debt situation.
Passing  Boehner 1.1 puts the onus back on the Democrats in the Senate to  produce an alternative, which would be their very first vote on any plan  in this crisis.  If they pass a Reid plan, then the entire issue goes  to a conference committee and we end up with a compromise on the  principles of the GOP.  If the Senate refuses to act at all, then it’s  not the fault of Republicans when the deadline arrives.
IBD’s  two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist Michael Ramirez  puts the crises in spending, long-term debt, and leadership into  single-frame perspective this morning:
Also,  be sure to check out Ramirez’ terrific collection of his works:  Everyone Has the Right to My Opinion, which covers the entire breadth of  Ramirez’ career, and it gives fascinating look at political history.   Read my review here, and watch my interviews with Ramirez here and here.   And don’t forget to check out the entire Investors.com site, which has  now incorporated all of the former IBD Editorials, while individual  investors still exist.
posted at 9:10 am on July 28, 2011 by Ed Morrissey
printer-friendly
As  John Boehner attempts to whip his caucus for a vote this morning on  version 1.1 of his debt-ceiling bill, the Speaker gets some support from  Investors Business Daily.  It’s not enthusiastic support, mind you, but  IBD’s editors seem to feel that the only thing worse than passion  Boehner 1.1 is not passing Boehner 1.1:
President  Obama may not have a plan for resolving the debt crisis, but he  definitely has a goal — to shift blame for the lousy economy onto  Republicans’ shoulders. Above all else, the GOP must not let that  happen.
When  House Speaker John Boehner released his latest plan to cut spending in  exchange for raising the debt ceiling, attacks from Obama and his fellow  Democrats were to be expected.
The  attacks from the GOP side, however, are short-sighted at best. They  risk giving Obama what he wants more than anything — a way to weasel out  of responsibility for the economic mess his policies have produced.
As Charles Krauthammer did on Wednesday, the conservative IBD editorial board urges Republicans to take a long view:
As  Obama’s poll numbers continue to sag, his hopes for re-election  increasingly depend on his ability to convince voters that he had  nothing to do with the lousy economy. And if the GOP blows the current  debt standoff, Obama will be free to blame any bad economic news going  forward on Republican intransigence.
Republicans  can’t let themselves fall into this trap. Obama, and Obama alone, is  responsible for the fact that two years after the recession ended, the  unemployment rate is above 9%, growth is stagnant, inflation is rising,  and federal spending and debt are exploding.
They  conclude with the thought that it’s better to lose a skirmish than the  entire war, but this isn’t even really losing the skirmish.  It’s not a  great victory either, but Republicans have changed the paradigm of  deficit reduction in Washington in this debate.  Tax hikes are off the  table, and we’re now talking about spending reductions to address the  long-term debt situation.
Passing  Boehner 1.1 puts the onus back on the Democrats in the Senate to  produce an alternative, which would be their very first vote on any plan  in this crisis.  If they pass a Reid plan, then the entire issue goes  to a conference committee and we end up with a compromise on the  principles of the GOP.  If the Senate refuses to act at all, then it’s  not the fault of Republicans when the deadline arrives.
IBD’s  two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist Michael Ramirez  puts the crises in spending, long-term debt, and leadership into  single-frame perspective this morning:
Also,  be sure to check out Ramirez’ terrific collection of his works:  Everyone Has the Right to My Opinion, which covers the entire breadth of  Ramirez’ career, and it gives fascinating look at political history.   Read my review here, and watch my interviews with Ramirez here and here.   And don’t forget to check out the entire Investors.com site, which has  now incorporated all of the former IBD Editorials, while individual  investors still exist.
